establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION.OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
BJG
Docket No: 397-14
26 February 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
record pursuant to the | provisions of Eile 10.0f£ the United States.
Roce, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25
February 2014. Your allegations of. error and injustice were reviewed
in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
‘applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with
alk material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
. applicable statutes, reguiations and policies.
After careful and conscientious’ consideration of: the entire record,
the Board “found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to
You enlisted in the Navy Reserve under the name of
using the Social Security Number (SSN) of | and entered
active duty on 25 February 1976. You recei cial punishment —
for assault. You were also diagnosed with a schizoid personality
disorder. You were then recommended for administrative. Separation due
~ to unsuitability (personality disorder) with a general,
characterization of service... You were so discharged on 1 November ;
1976, and assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention)
reenlistment code. . . wo , / 4
On 15 December 1976, you enlisted in the Na ‘under the name of
“ using the SSN of You were =
co ing your previous fraudulent enlistment and warned
that further misconduct could result in administrative separation.
You completed your active obligated service and were honorably
discharged.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and current desire
to change your SSN on your second Certificate of Release or Discharge
‘from Active Duty (DD Form 214). However, the Board concluded that the
SSN is correct in accordance with the information you provided to the
Navy at the time of your enlistment. In view of the above, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of
the panel will be furnished upon request. ,
git is regretted that ‘the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence
or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of ©
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when
applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is
-on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ete 3 - |
Res
_ ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2250-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of ‘unsuitability due to the diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04603-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 January 2011. However, the Board concluded that your reenlistment code should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder which existed prior to your enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2487-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the © existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2265-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to wrongful drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8639 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 June 2014. The Board noted that an RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8553 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7018S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4925 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6675 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in — support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04213-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 21 May 1976 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4009 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...